More Pages: White Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100


So Near and Yet So Far...Even Today

A Good Learning Tool

Bryan White review By: Sarah HaleI just can't tell you enough about it. It is a really cool book you will just have to read it yourself to find out what I mean.
That is if your in to Bryan White.
review by: Sarah Hale


From the book jacket:Budgeting and Governing gathers in one place a mass of material that otherwise would be lost in a wilderness of journals and edited volumes. With few exceptions, Wildavsky chose the articles in this collection. They are organized largely chronologically, so that the reader can trace the progression of his thought, which moved from studies of the American federal government, through comparative work, and on to placing budgeting within a broader theory of political culture.
Wildavsky wrote about budgeting because, in his words, "when a process involves power, authority, culture, consensus, and conflict, it captures a great deal of national political life." Wildavsky was interested in budgeting because of what it could tell us about the classic questions of politics: who gets what, how, and why? His earlier analyses focus narrowly on budgeting personnel and agency actors in answering these questions, while in his later work, the contending actors become sub-cultural types.
To Wildavsky, budgeting was about finding terms for living together in spite of ideological differences. Budgetary incrementalism helped to manage this otherwise unmanageable task. He thought synoptic budgeting and all related reforms would increase disagreement and raise the stakes, and so were unwise. Analysis had to serve politics, not try to displace it.


What the Ozarks region is really like!

Best book ever written about the early history of the Cubs.

Made buying a car fun instead of a headache.Years before I read the book, I bought a car (badly). I had done --everything-- wrong as described by the book. That purchase was not fun.
After reading the book, the process of buying the next car was tense but fun.
I really think the book allowed me to make a satisfactory deal and feel comfortable that I had made a good deal.
Not a good book for those with un-realistic expectations about pricing. No matter how much you negotiate, the dealer will not sell you a car unless he makes a profit. You just don't want him to make too BIG a profit! The book will help with that limitation.


The best work ever on the Zulu Wars.

Wonderfully encouraging and inspiring book

She takes the reader to rural Texas 1940s like it was today
Think about it: You can see where you want to go...you know what you must do to get there...and you are confident of your abilities. So your upward journey within the organization begins. Just as Dorothy saw the distant glow of Oz, you see just as clearly your own destination. It excites you, it inspires you, and you begin to think about how wonderful it will be to get there. As you carefully ascend, you encounter what seems to be a pane of glass. Your face is flush against it. You can still see your destination above you, so near and yet so far. You have hit the "glass ceiling." Now what?
The authors organize their material within eight chapters whose titles correctly indicate the sequence of their analysis:
The Ceiling and the Wall: The Double Barrier to the Top
Up or Out: How Women Succeed, How They Derail
Perception Is Reality: The Narrow Band of Acceptable Behavior
Lessons for Success I : It's Not Enough to Work Hard
Lessons for Success II: It's Not Enough to Work Smart
Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Making It to General Management
Hitting the Wall: Facing Limits, Finding Alternatives
The Future: Can Women Make It to the Top?
Where Are They Now? According to the authors, they are encouraged by two trends: the development of a new "business imperative" which requires organizations to utilize fully all of its human assets, and, the renewal of "legal and legislative pressures." The former is best understood in terms of enlightened self-interest; the second is best understood in terms of the threat of litigation if prevailing laws against gender discrimination have been violated. Whatever it takes. The authors observe: "While there is still a long way to go, progress is being made. Some have broken, or at least cracked the glass ceiling, while others have found ways around it. All have treated the last several years as a learning experience and have applied their own advice in facing the challenges of pioneering women." The "business imperative" as well as "legal and legislative pressures" may have done much to eliminate the "glass ceiling" within organizations. Well and good. But a significant challenge remains: To remove it it, also, from within the minds of those who have been its victims.
Breaking the Glass Ceiling (bold face) helps us to measure what has been accomplished since 1987 when it was first published; 14 years later, it reminds us of what remains to be done.